Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (1.74 vs 2.00, Δ 0.26).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 1.74 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.00Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 565Lead | Accurate passes | 282 |
| 637Lead | Total passes | 356 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |