Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (3.15 vs 0.86, Δ 2.29).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Chelsea held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86 |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 498Lead | Accurate passes | 256 |
| 560Lead | Total passes | 328 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.28 | Goals prevented | 0.28 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chelsea | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |