Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (9 vs 5 shots).
- Cheltenham was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 44%).
- AFC Wimbledon held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 0 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 56% | Pass accuracy | 67%Lead |
| 151 | Accurate passes | 257Lead |
| 270 | Total passes | 385Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.