Match statistics snapshot
- Barnet fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Barnet was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 7 | Shots off target |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 62%Lead | Pass accuracy | 55% |
| 178Lead | Accurate passes | 157 |
| 288Lead | Total passes | 284 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 23 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |