Match statistics snapshot
- Barrow created the clearer chances on xG (1.85 vs 2.66, Δ 0.81).
- Cheltenham fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Barrow was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 1.85 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.66Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 293Lead | Accurate passes | 247 |
| 383Lead | Total passes | 345 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.