Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham fired more attempts (22 vs 2 shots).
- Birmingham was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 0%).
- Birmingham held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 12Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 316 | Accurate passes | 572Lead |
| 431 | Total passes | 682Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |