Match statistics snapshot
- Cambridge United created the clearer chances on xG (0.73 vs 1.33, Δ 0.60).
- Cambridge United fired more attempts (11 vs 3 shots).
- Cambridge United was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.73 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.33Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 66%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 223Lead | Accurate passes | 184 |
| 336Lead | Total passes | 301 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.