Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 2.31, Δ 1.50).
- Gillingham fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Cheltenham held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.31Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 288Lead | Accurate passes | 224 |
| 388Lead | Total passes | 326 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |