Match statistics snapshot
- Grimsby created the clearer chances on xG (0.97 vs 1.18, Δ 0.21).
- Cheltenham fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Grimsby was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Grimsby |
|---|---|---|
| 0.97 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.18Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Grimsby |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 272Lead | Accurate passes | 218 |
| 374Lead | Total passes | 307 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Grimsby |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Grimsby |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cheltenham | Statistic | Grimsby |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.