Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City created the clearer chances on xG (1.65 vs 0.87, Δ 0.78).
- Chengdu Better City fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Chengdu Better City was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.87 |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 291 | Accurate passes | 390Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 460Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.