Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City created the clearer chances on xG (2.30 vs 0.75, Δ 1.55).
- Chengdu Better City fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Chengdu Better City held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 2.30Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 429Lead | Accurate passes | 291 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 363 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |