Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City created the clearer chances on xG (2.39 vs 0.67, Δ 1.72).
- Chengdu Better City fired more attempts (21 vs 4 shots).
- Qingdao Youth Island was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Qingdao Youth Island |
|---|---|---|
| 2.39Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.67 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box |
| 11Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Qingdao Youth Island |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 388Lead | Accurate passes | 239 |
| 477Lead | Total passes | 331 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Qingdao Youth Island |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Qingdao Youth Island |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Qingdao Youth Island |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |