Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 13%).
- SHANGHAI SIPG held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 6 |
| 10Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 251 | Accurate passes | 373Lead |
| 326 | Total passes | 444Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.