Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City created the clearer chances on xG (1.49 vs 1.17, Δ 0.32).
- SHANGHAI SIPG held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 193 | Accurate passes | 384Lead |
| 267 | Total passes | 462Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.