Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City created the clearer chances on xG (2.40 vs 1.27, Δ 1.13).
- Chengdu Better City was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 33%).
- SHANGHAI SIPG held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 2.40Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.27 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 216 | Accurate passes | 410Lead |
| 298 | Total passes | 479Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.