Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City created the clearer chances on xG (1.23 vs 0.24, Δ 0.99).
- Chengdu Better City fired more attempts (16 vs 3 shots).
- Wuhan Three Towns was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 1.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.24 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 441Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 531Lead | Total passes | 293 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chengdu Better City | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |