Match statistics snapshot
- Chesterfield created the clearer chances on xG (3.02 vs 1.85, Δ 1.17).
- Chesterfield fired more attempts (17 vs 16 shots).
- Accrington ST was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Accrington St |
|---|---|---|
| 3.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.85 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Accrington St |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 318Lead | Accurate passes | 198 |
| 425Lead | Total passes | 293 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Accrington St |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Accrington St |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Accrington St |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.