Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Chesterfield was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 234Lead | Accurate passes | 227 |
| 334Lead | Total passes | 329 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.