Match statistics snapshot
- Chesterfield created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 0.54, Δ 0.63).
- Chesterfield fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Cambridge United was more accurate in front of goal (17% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.54 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 427Lead | Accurate passes | 230 |
| 529Lead | Total passes | 333 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |