Match statistics snapshot
- Chesterfield created the clearer chances on xG (2.27 vs 1.86, Δ 0.41).
- Chesterfield fired more attempts (23 vs 14 shots).
- Shrewsbury was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 2.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.86 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 536Lead | Accurate passes | 127 |
| 620Lead | Total passes | 212 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.