Match statistics snapshot
- Tranmere created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 1.86, Δ 0.91).
- Tranmere fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Chesterfield was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Tranmere |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.86Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Tranmere |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 428Lead | Accurate passes | 150 |
| 506Lead | Total passes | 241 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Tranmere |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Tranmere |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Tranmere |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |