Match statistics snapshot
- Walsall created the clearer chances on xG (1.52 vs 1.98, Δ 0.46).
- Chesterfield fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Chesterfield was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 1.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.98Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 205 |
| 476Lead | Total passes | 303 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chesterfield | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |