Match statistics snapshot
- Chiangrai United fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Chiangrai United was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 36%).
- Trat FC held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chiangrai United | Statistic | Trat Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chiangrai United | Statistic | Trat Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 200 | Accurate passes | 360Lead |
| 261 | Total passes | 415Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chiangrai United | Statistic | Trat Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chiangrai United | Statistic | Trat Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chiangrai United | Statistic | Trat Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |