Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 17%).
- Atlanta United FC held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 209 | Accurate passes | 373Lead |
| 304 | Total passes | 461Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |