Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (24 vs 4 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 25%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 89% | Pass accuracy | |
| 558 | Accurate passes | |
| 628 | Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |