Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Atlanta United FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 427 | Accurate passes | 432Lead |
| 517 | Total passes | 539Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |