Match statistics snapshot
- Atlanta United FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 2.65, Δ 1.31).
- Atlanta United FC fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Atlanta United FC was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.65Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 314 | Accurate passes | 421Lead |
| 376 | Total passes | 485Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.