Match statistics snapshot
- Atlanta United FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.01 vs 1.27, Δ 0.26).
- Atlanta United FC fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Atlanta United FC was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.01 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.27Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 6 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 248 | Accurate passes | 529Lead |
| 336 | Total passes | 601Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |