Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (2.62 vs 1.31, Δ 1.31).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.31 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 379Lead | Accurate passes | 341 |
| 468Lead | Total passes | 435 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.30 | Goals prevented | 1.30 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.