Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (2.34 vs 1.68, Δ 0.66).
- Atlanta United FC fired more attempts (20 vs 18 shots).
- Atlanta United FC was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.68 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 18 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 377 | Accurate passes | 487Lead |
| 459 | Total passes | 554Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.02 | Goals prevented | -0.02 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |