Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (1.43 vs 1.74, Δ 0.31).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1.43 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 267 | Accurate passes | 464Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 547Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.