Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (3.05 vs 0.10, Δ 2.95).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (17 vs 4 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (65% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 3.05Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.10 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 3Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 237 | Accurate passes | 335Lead |
| 326 | Total passes | 428Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 2.08 | Goals prevented | 2.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.