Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 29%).
- Charlotte held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 4 |
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 271 | Accurate passes | 427Lead |
| 343 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |