Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (1.03 vs 0.55, Δ 0.48).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 203 |
| 464Lead | Total passes | 290 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.22 | Goals prevented | 1.22 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.