Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (1.43 vs 1.08, Δ 0.35).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1.43Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.08 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 560Lead | Accurate passes | 413 |
| 622Lead | Total passes | 480 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -1.04 | Goals prevented | -1.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.