Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (20 vs 10 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 442Lead | Accurate passes | 354 |
| 510Lead | Total passes | 412 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.