Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 1.05, Δ 0.53).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Columbus Crew held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05Lead |
| 7 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 352 | Accurate passes | 500Lead |
| 435 | Total passes | 574Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.