Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (1.53 vs 0.90, Δ 0.63).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1.53Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 340 | Accurate passes | 540Lead |
| 394 | Total passes | 604Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 1.24 | Goals prevented | 1.24 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.