Match statistics snapshot
- DC United was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 13%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Offsides | 8 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target |
| 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 434Lead | Accurate passes | 241 |
| 533Lead | Total passes | 338 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Fouls | 0 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.