Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 0.69, Δ 0.29).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- DC United was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.69 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 276Lead | Accurate passes | 183 |
| 394Lead | Total passes | 296 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.