Match statistics snapshot
- DC United created the clearer chances on xG (0.53 vs 0.69, Δ 0.16).
- DC United fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.53 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.69Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 534Lead | Accurate passes | 249 |
| 623Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.38 | Goals prevented | -0.38 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.