Match statistics snapshot
- DC United created the clearer chances on xG (2.50 vs 3.17, Δ 0.67).
- DC United fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- DC United held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 2.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.17Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 283 | Accurate passes | 407Lead |
| 366 | Total passes | 518Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.24 | Goals prevented | 0.24 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.