Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (1.93 vs 1.61, Δ 0.32).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- DC United was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.93Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.61 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 526Lead | Accurate passes | 208 |
| 635Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.23 | Goals prevented | -0.23 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.