Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (2.34 vs 1.05, Δ 1.29).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 445Lead | Accurate passes | 313 |
| 519Lead | Total passes | 397 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.87 | Goals prevented | -0.87 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.