Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (4.47 vs 1.58, Δ 2.89).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (33 vs 10 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 4.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 29Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 33Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 430Lead | Accurate passes | 356 |
| 506Lead | Total passes | 419 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 2.22 | Goals prevented | 2.22 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.