Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 14%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 444Lead | Accurate passes | 342 |
| 525Lead | Total passes | 436 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.