Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.54 vs 1.82, Δ 1.28).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Los Angeles FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.54 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.82Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 88% |
| 419 | Accurate passes | 432Lead |
| 478 | Total passes | 492Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.17 | Goals prevented | -1.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |