Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (0.62 vs 2.09, Δ 1.47).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots).
- Nashville SC held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.62 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.09Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 286 | Accurate passes | 410Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 489Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.