Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (1.67 vs 1.16, Δ 0.51).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.67Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.16 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 388 |
| 492Lead | Total passes | 470 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 1.70 | Goals prevented | 1.70 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.