Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (13 vs 4 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 46%).
- New England Revolution held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 323 | Accurate passes | 360Lead |
| 407 | Total passes | 448Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Fouls | 0 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.